Anchorage Digital vs Paxos

Head-to-head Bitcoin custodian comparison - qualified status, insurance, cold storage, and fees

Quick Answer

Anchorage Digital and Paxos are both qualified custodians. Anchorage Digital runs a hosted custody model, while Paxos uses third-party.

Anchorage Digital logo
Anchorage Digital
Hosted Custody
QualifiedYes
InsuranceLloyd's of London comprehensive policy
Cold Storage95%+ cold storage
Paxos logo
Paxos
Third-Party
QualifiedYes
InsuranceCrime insurance policy covering digital assets held in custody; additional coverage provided through Paxos Trust Company's NYDFS-regulated capital reserve requirements.
Cold Storage95%+

At a Glance

Qualified Custodian
Tied
More Insurance
Not stated
More Cold Storage
Tied
Lower Fee
Not stated
Full Comparison
MetricAnchorage DigitalPaxos
Qualified CustodianYes
Tie
Yes
Tie
Insurance CoverageLloyd's of London comprehensive policyCrime insurance policy covering digital assets held in custody; additional coverage provided through Paxos Trust Company's NYDFS-regulated capital reserve requirements.
Cold Storage95%+ cold storage
Tie
95%+
Tie
Proof of ReservesNoMonthly third-party attestations published for stablecoin reserves (USDP, PYUSD); custody asset attestations available to institutional clients on request.
Winner
Custody FeeCustom enterprise pricing based on AUM. Custody, trading, and staking fees quoted individually. Minimum $500K AUM.
Minimum Balance$500,000None
Winner
Audit FrequencyAnnual SOC audits
Tie
Annual SOC 2 Type II audit; ongoing NYDFS regulatory examinations
Tie
Custody ModelHosted CustodyThird-Party
Asset SegregationYes
LicensesOCC Federal Charter (first crypto-native), BSA/AML compliant, SOC 2 Type II
JurisdictionUnited States (OCC-chartered federal bank)New York, NY
Quality Score8.28.4
Winner
Multi-Sig SupportYes
Winner
No
Hardware Wallet SupportNo
Tie
No
Tie
Institutional ServicesYes
Tie
Yes
Tie
API AccessYes
Tie
Yes
Tie
Mobile AppYes
Winner
No
KYC RequiredYesYes
Bitcoin OnlyNoNo
Supported AssetsBTC, ETH, SOL, AVAX, DOT, MATIC, 40+ digital assetsBitcoin, Ethereum, and major digital assets
Withdrawal LimitsCustom per-client limits
Established20172012

Key Differences

Proof of Reserves

Paxos publishes proof of reserves; Anchorage Digital does not. Proof of reserves lets you verify that client balances are actually backed, independent of the provider's own reporting. It does not prove solvency on its own, since it shows assets without necessarily showing liabilities.

Which Is Right For You?

Paxos logoPaxos is best for:

Regulated US institutions seeking an NYDFS-chartered custodian with deep stablecoin and settlement infrastructure.

DRAFT - This page is not yet published. Complete the editorial take to publish.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Anchorage Digital and Paxos?
Anchorage Digital runs a hosted custody model, while Paxos uses third-party. Both are qualified custodians. Anchorage Digital is regulated in United States (OCC-chartered federal bank); Paxos in New York, NY.
Which has more insurance coverage, Anchorage Digital or Paxos?
Neither Anchorage Digital nor Paxos publishes a specific insurance figure, so the two cannot be ranked on coverage. Confirm current terms with each provider directly.
Is Anchorage Digital or Paxos a qualified custodian?
Yes. Both Anchorage Digital and Paxos are qualified custodians, meaning each is a chartered bank, trust company, or broker-dealer legally permitted to hold client assets on behalf of institutions.
Can I use both Anchorage Digital and Paxos?
Yes. Splitting holdings across two custodians is a common way to limit exposure to any single provider's failure, and some institutions are required to diversify custody. The trade-off is two sets of fees, two onboarding and compliance processes, and two operational relationships to monitor.

Explore More

Custodian details (qualified status, insurance, cold storage, audit cadence, and fees) are sourced from provider disclosures and public regulatory filings, and reviewed by the 21Rates team.

Data as of May 1, 2026.

This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Insurance coverage is typically pooled across all clients rather than allocated per account, and policy terms, limits, and exclusions vary. Confirm current terms directly with each provider before depositing assets.