GBTC vs ARKB

Head-to-head Bitcoin ETF comparison - expense ratios, AUM, performance, and more

Quick Answer

ARKB has the lower expense ratio at 0.21% versus 1.50%. Grayscale's GBTC is roughly 4x larger by assets ($8.4B vs $2.1B). ARK 21Shares's ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added) for Bitcoin custody, while GBTC uses Coinbase Custody.

GBTC logo
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
IssuerGrayscale
Expense Ratio1.50%
AUM$8.4B
ARKB logo
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
IssuerARK 21Shares
Expense Ratio0.21%
AUM$2.1B

At a Glance

Lower Fee
ARKB
Larger AUM
GBTC
More Liquid
Tied
Best YTD
ARKB
Full Comparison
MetricGBTCARKB
Expense Ratio1.50%0.21%
Winner
AUM$8.4B
Winner
$2.1B
Price$50.30$21.54
YTD Return-28.29%-27.69%
Winner
1-Year Return-45.59%-44.91%
Winner
Avg Daily Volume2.7M
Tie
3.6M
Tie
CustodianCoinbase CustodyCoinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added)
IssuerGrayscaleARK 21Shares
Inception DateSep 25, 2013Jan 11, 2024
Exchange ListedNYSE ArcaCboe BZX Exchange
SEC RegisteredYesYes

Key Differences

Different Custodians

GBTC holds its Bitcoin with Coinbase Custody, while ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added). Custodian choice affects your exposure to counterparty risk and the operational security model protecting the fund's Bitcoin.

Cost Difference

ARKB costs 1.29 percentage points less per year. On a $100,000 position held for 10 years, that compounds to meaningful savings. Over long holding periods, expense ratio differences are a primary driver of net returns.

Which Is Right For You?

GBTC logoGBTC is best for:

Investors seeking established Bitcoin exposure with institutional-grade custodial security

ARKB logoARKB is best for:

U.S. investors seeking low-cost direct Bitcoin exposure through a dual-custodied spot ETF

21Rates Take

GBTC and ARKB differ primarily on cost, with ARKB offering a dramatically lower expense ratio compared to GBTC's legacy fee structure. GBTC's staying power comes from its decade-long history as the primary institutional Bitcoin vehicle and a large existing holder base reluctant to sell because of embedded gains. ARKB is a modern ETF with competitive pricing from day one. New investors have no compelling reason to choose GBTC over ARKB on fee grounds. Only existing GBTC holders with significant unrealized gains face a genuine dilemma.

Reviewed by 21Rates Editorial on Jul 20, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between GBTC and ARKB?
GBTC is issued by Grayscale and charges a 1.50% expense ratio, while ARKB is issued by ARK 21Shares at 0.21%. Both are spot Bitcoin ETFs that hold physical Bitcoin. They differ in issuer, custody arrangements (GBTC uses Coinbase Custody; ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added)), and overall fund scale.
Which has the lower expense ratio, GBTC or ARKB?
ARKB has a lower expense ratio at 0.21% versus 1.50% for GBTC.
Which ETF has more assets under management?
GBTC is the larger fund by AUM at $8.4B versus $2.1B for ARKB.
Can I hold both GBTC and ARKB at the same time?
Yes. Both funds can be held in most brokerage accounts simultaneously. However, since both track Bitcoin, holding both creates highly correlated exposure. Most investors choose one fund to keep costs and complexity low.

Explore More

Market data (price, AUM, volume, returns) is updated up to 3 times daily from live market sources. Expense ratios and fund details are sourced from fund prospectuses and issuer disclosures.

Data as of Aug 8, 2026.

This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin ETFs are subject to market risk including the potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results.