IBIT vs ARKB

Head-to-head Bitcoin ETF comparison - expense ratios, AUM, performance, and more

Quick Answer

ARKB has the lower expense ratio at 0.21% versus 0.25%. iShares's IBIT is roughly 22x larger by assets ($46.5B vs $2.1B) and trades about 13x the daily volume. ARK 21Shares's ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added) for Bitcoin custody, while IBIT uses Coinbase Custody.

IBIT logo
IBIT
BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
IssueriShares
Expense Ratio0.25%
AUM$46.5B
ARKB logo
ARKB
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
IssuerARK 21Shares
Expense Ratio0.21%
AUM$2.1B

At a Glance

Lower Fee
ARKB
Larger AUM
IBIT
More Liquid
IBIT
Best YTD
Tied
Full Comparison
MetricIBITARKB
Expense Ratio0.25%0.21%
Winner
AUM$46.5B
Winner
$2.1B
Price$36.80$21.54
YTD Return-27.76%
Tie
-27.69%
Tie
1-Year Return-44.93%
Tie
-44.91%
Tie
Avg Daily Volume46.7M
Winner
3.6M
CustodianCoinbase CustodyCoinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added)
IssueriSharesARK 21Shares
Inception DateJan 5, 2024Jan 11, 2024
Exchange ListedNasdaqCboe BZX Exchange
SEC RegisteredYesYes

Key Differences

Different Custodians

IBIT holds its Bitcoin with Coinbase Custody, while ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added). Custodian choice affects your exposure to counterparty risk and the operational security model protecting the fund's Bitcoin.

Liquidity Gap

IBIT trades significantly more volume on average, making it easier to enter and exit large positions with tighter bid-ask spreads. ARKB is less liquid and can see wider spreads during volatile sessions.

Which Is Right For You?

IBIT logoIBIT is best for:

U.S. investors seeking low-cost spot Bitcoin exposure through a major asset manager

ARKB logoARKB is best for:

U.S. investors seeking low-cost direct Bitcoin exposure through a dual-custodied spot ETF

21Rates Take

IBIT and ARKB charge nearly identical expense ratios, but they differ in issuer profile. IBIT is backed by BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, while ARKB is a joint product from ARK Invest and 21Shares, pairing Cathie Wood's innovation brand with 21Shares' deep crypto ETP expertise. IBIT dominates on AUM and trading volume by a wide margin. ARKB appeals to investors who already hold ARK funds and want a Bitcoin ETF that fits their existing portfolio narrative. On pure cost and liquidity, these two are essentially neck and neck.

Reviewed by 21Rates Editorial on Jul 20, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between IBIT and ARKB?
IBIT is issued by iShares and charges a 0.25% expense ratio, while ARKB is issued by ARK 21Shares at 0.21%. Both are spot Bitcoin ETFs that hold physical Bitcoin. They differ in issuer, custody arrangements (IBIT uses Coinbase Custody; ARKB uses Coinbase Custody (primary, with BitGo added)), and overall fund scale.
Which has the lower expense ratio, IBIT or ARKB?
ARKB has a lower expense ratio at 0.21% versus 0.25% for IBIT.
Which ETF has more assets under management?
IBIT is the larger fund by AUM at $46.5B versus $2.1B for ARKB.
Can I hold both IBIT and ARKB at the same time?
Yes. Both funds can be held in most brokerage accounts simultaneously. However, since both track Bitcoin, holding both creates highly correlated exposure. Most investors choose one fund to keep costs and complexity low.

Explore More

Market data (price, AUM, volume, returns) is updated up to 3 times daily from live market sources. Expense ratios and fund details are sourced from fund prospectuses and issuer disclosures.

Data as of Aug 8, 2026.

This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin ETFs are subject to market risk including the potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results.