IBIT vs FBTC

Head-to-head Bitcoin ETF comparison - expense ratios, AUM, performance, and more

Quick Answer

IBIT and FBTC both charge 0.25%, and their returns are nearly identical - the real differences are size and custody. iShares's IBIT is roughly 4x larger by assets ($46.5B vs $10.8B) and trades about 11x the daily volume. Fidelity's FBTC uses Fidelity Digital Assets for Bitcoin custody, while IBIT uses Coinbase Custody.

IBIT logo
IBIT
BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
IssueriShares
Expense Ratio0.25%
AUM$46.5B
FBTC logo
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund ETF
IssuerFidelity
Expense Ratio0.25%
AUM$10.8B

At a Glance

Lower Fee
Tied
Larger AUM
IBIT
More Liquid
IBIT
Best YTD
Tied
Full Comparison
MetricIBITFBTC
Expense Ratio0.25%
Tie
0.25%
Tie
AUM$46.5B
Winner
$10.8B
Price$36.80$56.53
YTD Return-27.76%
Tie
-27.70%
Tie
1-Year Return-44.93%
Tie
-44.93%
Tie
Avg Daily Volume46.7M
Winner
4.4M
CustodianCoinbase CustodyFidelity Digital Assets
IssueriSharesFidelity
Inception DateJan 5, 2024Jan 11, 2024
Exchange ListedNasdaqCboe BZX Exchange
SEC RegisteredYesYes

Key Differences

Different Custodians

IBIT holds its Bitcoin with Coinbase Custody, while FBTC uses Fidelity Digital Assets. Custodian choice affects your exposure to counterparty risk and the operational security model protecting the fund's Bitcoin.

Liquidity Gap

IBIT trades significantly more volume on average, making it easier to enter and exit large positions with tighter bid-ask spreads. FBTC is less liquid and can see wider spreads during volatile sessions.

Which Is Right For You?

IBIT logoIBIT is best for:

U.S. investors seeking low-cost spot Bitcoin exposure through a major asset manager

FBTC logoFBTC is best for:

Fidelity account holders seeking low-cost direct Bitcoin exposure via a regulated spot ETF

21Rates Take

IBIT and FBTC are the two most liquid spot Bitcoin ETFs on the market, backed by BlackRock and Fidelity respectively. Both carry identical expense ratios and offer institutional-grade custody, making them nearly interchangeable for most investors. IBIT edges ahead on raw trading volume and options availability, while FBTC appeals to investors already embedded in the Fidelity ecosystem with seamless brokerage integration. If you hold assets at Fidelity, FBTC is the natural choice. Everyone else will likely default to IBIT for maximum liquidity and options depth.

Reviewed by 21Rates Editorial on Jul 20, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between IBIT and FBTC?
IBIT is issued by iShares and charges a 0.25% expense ratio, while FBTC is issued by Fidelity at 0.25%. Both are spot Bitcoin ETFs that hold physical Bitcoin. They differ in issuer, custody arrangements (IBIT uses Coinbase Custody; FBTC uses Fidelity Digital Assets), and overall fund scale.
Which has the lower expense ratio, IBIT or FBTC?
Both IBIT and FBTC charge the same 0.25% annual expense ratio.
Which ETF has more assets under management?
IBIT is the larger fund by AUM at $46.5B versus $10.8B for FBTC.
Can I hold both IBIT and FBTC at the same time?
Yes. Both funds can be held in most brokerage accounts simultaneously. However, since both track Bitcoin, holding both creates highly correlated exposure. Most investors choose one fund to keep costs and complexity low.

Explore More

Market data (price, AUM, volume, returns) is updated up to 3 times daily from live market sources. Expense ratios and fund details are sourced from fund prospectuses and issuer disclosures.

Data as of Aug 8, 2026.

This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin ETFs are subject to market risk including the potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results.